Troubling a Star

Dear Ones,

This year for Earth Day, I went to Antarctica from my living room chair. Madeleine L’Engle brought me there, through the novel Troubling a Star.

Troubling a Star

The book, the final in the Austin Family Chronicles, opens with a teenaged, terrified Vicky clinging to an iceberg in the ocean. Before we read about any rescue operation (or even how she came to be floating alone at the bottom of the globe), we travel to the bottom of South America, to a fictitious nation with seriously sketchy plans for the icy continent. From there, Madeleine weaves a dramatic tale of danger, strange and not altogether noble characters, and a little romance. It’s great.

But more, Troubling a Star is proof that storytelling does so much more for activism, for environmentalism, for our imaginations than facts alone can.

Her story is less “here are pictures of trash in the ocean” and more “(the icebergs) seemed to have an inner light, to contain deep within their ice the fires of the sun from the days when the planet was young.” More awe, less clickbait; more feeding the imagination, less doomsday. It’s just the thesis Madeleine writes about in her nonfiction: story goes a lot farther than facts. For one, stories personify greed and then dares its heroes not to be indifferent — and so, then, the reader. Second, Troubling a Star shows us the beauty of a place most of us won’t ever go; and we’re more likely to care about a place if it’s not just an abstract idea.

In short, you could tweet lines from the book now and sound just as relevant as Madeleine did in 1994. All that’s missing are some hashtags: “Greed is always nearsighted,” and “Without our angels, I believe we would be in a worse state than we are.” And this song — how true:

All things by immortal power,
Near or far,
Hiddenly
To each other linked are,
That thou canst not stir a flower
Without troubling a star.

Madeleine visited Antarctica before writing Troubling a Star, so the details Vicky sees are legitimate. A nonfiction book was born not long after the trip, too: Penguins and Golden Calves: Icons and Idols in Antarctica and Other Unexpected Places.

What a strange thing, to visit a place where tourists just don’t go in big numbers, where animals are threatened and icebergs are melting … all because of the way we use the planet and its resources thousands of miles away. But it’s for this, I think, words she gives a scientist in Troubling a Star.

“The planet has been sending us multiple messages, and the powers that be have ignored them. So it’s up to us, and my guess is that when you finish this trip you’ll feel as protective of this amazing land as I do.”

Tesser well,

Erin F. Wasinger, for MadeleineLEngle.com.

My mind went to Madeleine L’Engle last week when I saw the first picture of a black hole.

Science, astronomy, physics, quantum mechanics — all those things caught her imagination. In And It Was Good: Reflections on Beginnings, Madeleine writes about how she and her husband (Hugh Franklin) would gaze at the stars, “seeing out to the furthest reaches of space and time.” The “wild and wonderful universe” was a familiar topic in her fiction and nonfiction.

 

“Everything changes with every major scientific discovery,” Madeleine L’Engle said to a forum audience more than a decade ago.

She mused on black holes in that speech, which was called “Searching for Truth Through Fantasy.” “We don’t understand black holes,” she said. “But maybe if we get through one, we would come out into another universe, something quite different, yet it would still be God’s universe.”

The news was another confirmation of Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity. As the New York Times reports, “General relativity led to a new conception of the cosmos, in which space-time could quiver, bend, rip, expand, swirl like a mix-master and even disappear forever into the maw of a black hole.” (I don’t really understand it, either.)

To Madeleine, Einstein was a theologian of the highest esteem. Madeleine often found herself defending the role of science in religion. Science “won’t do anything to change the nature of God, any more than Galileo’s discoveries changed the nature of God,” she wrote in And It Was Good.

The picture of the black hole only brings up more questions. For one thing, what happens to stuff that falls into a black hole? What’s the force in the black hole?

I think Madeleine would’ve loved it.

“I like things that do not have explanations,” she said to that audience so long ago.

Madeleine continuously spoke and wrote about the importance of asking good questions, and not being hung up on answers. For her, the mysteries of science were a window onto creation. In A Rock That Is Higher: Story as the Search for Truth, she says:

When we human creatures opened the heart of the atom we opened ourselves to the possibility of terrible destruction, but also—and we tend to forget this —- to a vision of interrelatedness and unity that can provide a theology for us to live by.

She continues later.

The discoveries made since the heart of the atom was opened have changed our view of the universe and of Creation. Our great radio telescopes are picking up echoes of that primal opening which expanded into all the stars in their courses. The universe is far greater and grander and less predictable than anyone realized, and one reaction to this is to turn our back on the glory and settle for a small, tribal god who forbids questions of any kind. Another reaction is to feel so small and valueless in comparison to the enormity of the universe that it becomes impossible to believe in a God who can be bothered with us tiny, finite creatures with life spans no longer than the blink of an eye. Or we can simply rejoice in a God who is beyond our comprehension but who comprehends us and cares about us.

The new glimpse at the universe given to us last week is a reminder to be open to revelation and to keep asking questions.

Erin F. Wasinger for MadeleineLEngle.com.

Meg saved the world again last week in East Lansing, Michigan.

Michigan State University’s theater department transformed an intimate stage into Camazotz for the occasion, bringing to campus a stage adaptation of A Wrinkle in Time.

Photo Courtesy of Michigan State University.

This was a book-lover’s show: a tribute to the story and its truth, not a high-tech reproduction of detail-by-detail world-building.

“The reader is very present in this adaptation,” said A Wrinkle in Time director Ryan Welsh, assistant professor of theatre at Michigan State. Student actors reading copies of the Newbery Award-winning book step into and out of the imagined reality playing out on stage. Sometimes the actor-readers narrate when internal thoughts make the action go silent. Parts of this adaptation is right from the novel, dialogue verbatim.

“The cast is comprised of readers that are living in 1962 and they crack open this book and it’s through their collective conjuring of their imaginations that the story comes to life,” he said.

Tracy Young adapted the novel for the Oregon Shakespeare Festival about five years ago. The script is available through Stage Partners, along with a few other adaptations, each one suited to different cast sizes, audiences, and other needs. (To read or download the script, see Stage Partners’ Wrinkle in Time page here.) Theater troupes from Seattle Pacific University to a community group in Australia will perform Young’s play in the next year.

In Michigan State’s production, the audience had an intimate spot. Every scene from the Murrys’ house to Camazotz and back were performed in a round, and entering the theater was an immersion in the production before it even began.

A man in a red flannel shirt swept a part of the stage, surprising some of us by later playing Fortinbras the dog, among other roles. A student sat at a stool, reading from a big book. A woman held up paint swatches to a pillar in the corner of the stage, then “painted the wall” with a dry brush. A boy dressed like a teen from the ‘60s bounced a basketball just off stage; a woman lingered by the stove.

All this happened while audience members were finding seats, using the restroom, finishing snacks. Unless one was paying attention, the cast’s comings and goings could be mistaken for the normal comings and goings of an excited crowd.

Eventually, they all settled in scattered spots around the room, reading copies of A Wrinkle in Time. The lights dimmed; the play began.

How do you create a magical, otherworld on stage (without the budget behind, say, The Cursed Child)? Welsh used the “sandbox idea”: they used what they had and let imaginations take over the rest. The narrative was entrancing enough. The movement-driven, ever-changing ensemble cast made the play soar. Somehow, the low-key components — Aunt Beast, the act of tessering, even IT — were more engrossing because they lacked flashiness.

When they needed a dog, one of the actors crouched with an origami-looking dog’s head in one hand. When they needed to convey tessering, lights did the heavy lifting. A white sheet became the Brain. Best, most convincing, was Charles Wallace under IT’s power. Inspired by a Japanese dance theater move called Butoh, his shoulders, neck, knees all moved in odd, jerky, horrific ways, amping up the terror for the audience.

My copy of A Wrinkle in Time suggests that readers be 10 or older; the play had the same recommendation. Though Wrinkle is considered children’s literature, Welsh said he didn’t want to do a play for kids. Instead, his philosophical approach was to let the actors create an illusion that would let the audience’s imaginations take over.

Welsh, who has a film background, said he knew the danger of adapting a well-loved book for the stage — especially this one, what he called the “grandmother of young adult fiction.”

“There’s so much credit owed and due to that book,” he said. So he didn’t want to simply tell the story; he wanted the audience to join actors on the adventure.

A Wrinkle in Time on stage “invites (the audience) to engage with it in order for (the story) to feel valid, magical and special and all the things we want it to feel,” he said. Magical and special aren’t usually words reserved for grown-up theater, but Welsh said they should be.

“(We adults are) so wrapped up in the grind that we forget how to fantasize,” he said. This adaptation says, “Come, imagine with us, in a similar way a book does.”

I felt that permission to let my imagination romp around during the production. Right after landing in the twins’ vegetable garden, right before the cast bows, a small, holy spell hung in the air. Meg may have saved the world, but the audience? We tessered right with her.

Erin F. Wasinger, for MadeleineLEngle.com.

Teacher's Guide for Become Madeline

Dear Ones,

A new teachers’ guide is out, inspiring deeper conversations around the book Becoming Madeleine: A Biography of the Author of A Wrinkle in Time by her Granddaughters.

The unit is perfect for encouraging students to think critically about artists, their work, and childhood influences. The book lends itself to reflecting on Madeleine L’Engle herself in a unique way. Charlotte Jones Voiklis and Léna Roy’s book is unlike boring, dry biographies that are often foisted on young readers. Instead, Becoming Madeleine includes never-before-shared pictures, letters, diary entries, and insight only Madeleine’s granddaughters could tell.

Teacher's Guide for Become Madeline

The teachers’ guide takes the learning a step further by relating Madeleine’s life to her legacy and her work. Questions and writing prompts spark some critical thinking (and meet Common Core standards, which you can tweak til your heart’s content to fit your audience). Here’s a couple, for example:

  • Though she could be social, Madeleine struggled with peer relationships periodically and spent a great deal of time in her own head, dreaming of stories. How might doing this help create a storyteller?
  • Throughout the biography, readers learn that while trying to excel at her craft, Madeleine reaches out to published poets and authors. What can readers infer about her based on these actions?

Aspiring young authors and new fans of L’Engle (especially those middle-grade readers) can be encouraged in the discussions, too, to reflect on their own lives and work. Ooh. So good, right?

The guide is free, just like the guide for A Wrinkle in Time; both compliments of Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, an imprint of Macmillan Children’s Publishing Group. Let us know how you’re using them in classroom! We’d love to hear about what it’s inspired.

 

Tesser well,

Erin F. Wasinger, for madeleinelengle.com.

 

P.S. The ebook is on sale through the end of March 2019!

Original cover of A Wrinkle in Time, designed by Ellen Raskin, 1962.

Dear Ones,

We’re happy to share that a new A Wrinkle in Time teacher resource has arrived! Get your copy of the free resource here, compliments of Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, an imprint of Macmillan Children’s Publishing Group.

A Wrinkle in Time, the winner of the 1963 Newbery Medal and many young readers’ first encounter with Madeleine’s work, celebrated its 50th anniversary in 2013. It continues to rock the socks off its first-time readers, as teachers and school librarians can attest.

Original cover of A Wrinkle in Time, designed by Ellen Raskin, 1962.I (Erin) remember first reading A Wrinkle in Time as a middle-schooler. I can still picture my school’s copy with its blue cover, colliding circles, and white silhouettes. The sides of its pages were worn smooth by readers before me (a quiet endorsement in a school library). I loved the story and was confused all at once, pouring over its pages from the dark and stormy night to Meg’s return home. Most memorable, though, was my impulse to talk about the book with my friends: I simply had to.

Preteens in conversation … about a book? Now that’s the highest form of praise.

This new teachers’ guide can inspire that sort of magic, too. You’ll find great prompts for classroom discussions and essay-writing, STEM-related stuff, plus activities that range from exploring themes to exploring space. Questions related to the eponymous 2018 movie (directed by Ava Duvernay) are included, too. Icing on the cake: citations for Common Core alignment. Boom.

Find this new resource — and other A Wrinkle in Time resources — on the educators’ page.

Oh, one more thing: Are you using A Wrinkle in Time in your classroom? Are your students writing amazing essays or doing creative projects? Let us know! We’ll recognize outstanding student work — and the teachers who make that possible — with a blog post and swag! Please contact charlotte [at] madeleinelengle [dot] com.

Tesser well,

Erin F. Wasinger, for madeleinelengle.com.

Dear Ones,

Audiobook lovers, rejoice! New audio editions of Madeleine’s Austin Family Chronicles series are out in the world, through Penguin Random House Audio. These make a great listen for middle-grade or YA readers (or any of us who wished we were Austins).

The five books in the Austin Family series follow Vicky Austin as she navigates growing up. Incredibly, the voice actor in this new edition captures this progression: listen to Jorjeana Marie’s talents yourself in previews of the first and final books: Meet the Austins and Troubling a Star. (Pretty cool, right?)

Madeleine L’Engle, circa 1984. Courtesy of Sea World San Diego, by Eva C. Ewing.

Fun fact: Did you know that we celebrated new additions to the series for more than 30 years? Madeleine first published Meet the Austins in 1960, followed by The Moon By Night in ‘63, and The Young Unicorns in ‘68. It wasn’t until 1980 that Newbery Honor book A Ring of Endless Light landed on the scene. Troubling a Star completed the series in 1994.

Happy listening,

Erin F. Wasinger, for madeleinelengle.com.

P.S. — And don’t miss audiobooks from the Time Quintet — read by Madeleine herself! Click here for those.

In the Cathedral Library, circa 1980.

Dear Ones,

Listening to Madeleine L’Engle read A Wrinkle in Time is nothing short of captivating.

Hear for yourself: It was a dark and stormy night, she begins, with not an ounce of sentimentality. Hooking the listener with her passionate cadence in this opening scene, the audio narration continues: In her attic bedroom Margaret Murry, wrapped in an old patchwork quilt, sat on the foot of her bed and watched the trees tossing in the frenzied lashing of the wind. When Meg shakes, I shook, sensing the storm that opens A Wrinkle in Time.

Listening to the audio in the author’s voice is a gift, available now thanks to restored recordings Penguin Random House Audio. Penguin Listening Library’s versions come from recordings done from 1993 to 1996 of A Wrinkle in Time, A Wind in the Door, and A Swiftly Tilting Planet. Sample and purchase the recordings here:

A Wrinkle in Time, or listen on Audible;

A Wind in the Door, or listen on Audible;

A Swiftly Tilting Planet, or listen on Audible.

Happy listening!

Erin F. Wasinger, for madeleinelengle.com.

 

 

Dear Ones,

Have you seen the quotes we’ve been sharing? They’re from librarians all over the country about how Madeleine’s books affected them. We want to share more of them, and are inviting readers everywhere to respond. Click here to tell us, and if you choose, we might share on our social media platforms and tag you.

Follow #LEngle100 to see what other people are saying.

Tesser well!

Guest blog post by Laurie Lane

Laurie Lane is a poet who lives on an island surrounded by beauty in Washington state. Laurie loves words and loves watching her granddaughters as they discover the delight of language.

I was Madeleine L’Engle’s assistant in the mid 1990s. In 1998, as she was nearing 80 years old, I approached her with the idea of producing one of her books in an audio format with hers as the lead voice and mine in a supporting role. She was interested in the idea and agreed to do it. Recording The Sphinx at Dawn in the Merlin Studios on Broadway in New York City with the percussionist Glen Velez on his frame drum proved to be a most remarkable experience.  It was released by Brilliance Audio in April of 2018 in this her centennial year and is available at online retail sites.

Photo: Madeleine L’Engle and Laurie Lane. Courtesy of Laurie Lane

We are told as writers to find our literary “voice.”  While reading and listening to the voices of others, we often do find our own voice. My motivation to produce The Sphinx at Dawn was so that people who loved Madeleine L’Engle and her work would not only appreciate her literary voice, but would be able to hear her own voice for the rest of their days.

She read the part of the camel in both stories “Pakkos Camel” and “The Sphinx at Dawn” and in both of those stories, the camel speaks, but when the young boy Jesus tries to talk to the camel again, the camel doesn’t speak. This was true with Madeleine and me. She spoke and I listened. Now her living voice is no longer heard.  But she still speaks and we can listen, and we can hear what she has to say to us that is so relevant to our lives and this world today. She always had a special line that she would use at book signings. For The Sphinx at Dawn it was “Listen to the camel.” As Madeleine’s friend and someone who highly respects her gift of writing, I would urge you to listen to The Sphinx at Dawn.

Listen to the camel.

Listen to Madeleine.

–Laurie B. Lane

Abigail Santamaria is working on the first fully-sourced adult biography of Madeleine L’Engle, which will be published by Farrar, Straus & Giroux, Madeleine’s publisher for more than fifty years. With this contribution in honor of the 100th anniversary of Madeleine’s birth, she gives us a brief taste of the full life story to come.  It will be on the website “About” section, with photographs and memorabilia.

One hundred years ago, in the pre-dawn hours of November 29, 1918, Madeleine L’Engle’s mother hastily scrawled this letter to her husband, a lieutenant stationed in France: “Dearest Husband, My labor has come. I am going now to the hospital. How I long for you.”

Later that day, she gave birth to the child for whom she had yearned for 11 years, a baby girl who would grow up to become one of the most beloved American authors of the 20th century.

Madeleine’s earliest and most formative memory was being awakened from sleep and carried out to the beach on a clear, cloudless night. The expansive dark sky, the bright stars, and the sound of the waves offered a glimpse of glory, a revelation of creation and its bounty. This first glimpse of the enormity and depth of the universe would contribute to Madeleine’s understanding that science and God are not at odds — a radical and, to some, even blasphemous assertion that would appear as a theme in several of her novels, including Camilla and A Wrinkle in Time.

In the New York City of her childhood, Madeleine saw little of the stars and not enough of her parents. Born on November 29, 1918, in New York City, Madeleine was the only child of two artists — her father, Charles, was a journalist, novelist, and playwright, and her mother, also named Madeleine, a pianist. Socialites with a full calendar, Charles and Madeleine often left their daughter in the care of a housekeeper, an Irish Catholic immigrant called Mrs. O.

While young Madeleine’s parents tended to their daughter’s cultural and academic education, spiritual and emotional care was Mrs. O’s domain. “Wherever she was, there was laughter and joy, the infallible signs of the presence of God,” Madeleine wrote years later.

When she wasn’t with Mrs. O, Madeleine spent hours alone in her bedroom, where she read, wrote, and dreamed. She began writing as soon as she could hold a pencil, and when she had finished all the books on her bookshelf, she composed her own stories and poems. A few years later, her father passed down his old typewriter, which became the tool she used to write her first novels.

When Madeleine was 12, her parents moved to Europe and abruptly deposited her at the Chatelard School in Switzerland, an elite all-girls boarding school where she felt abandoned, alienated, and shattered by the loss of privacy. Surrounded by cliquish and petty peers, under the watchful eyes of school matrons, Madeleine was forced to develop a new skill: an impenetrable “force field of silence” that she could inhabit like a magical cloak. “Within that force field, I could go on writing my stories and my poems and dreaming my dreams,” she said in an interview decades later. It was an effective tool, and one that would always serve her creatively.

That experience, she would later say, helped her become a writer. And what a writer she would become.

Three years later, Madeleine and her parents moved back to the United States and, just shy of her 15th birthday, Madeleine was sent away to yet another boarding school: Ashley Hall, in Charleston, South Carolina. But unlike at Chatelard, she quickly settled in and found her niche, though making friends remained a challenge. Joining the drama club, she discovered both a love for performing and an interest in playwriting. Her dedication to writing in general became consuming. “I was born with the itch for writing in me, and o, i couldn’t stop it if i tried,” she wrote in her journal in 1934.

Madeleine’s high school years were shaken by two deaths–the first, of her grandmother, and then, more traumatically, her father’s. In the fall of 1936, shortly before her 18th birthday, Charles fell gravely ill with pneumonia. News of his hospitalization was dispatched to Ashley Hall and she was summoned to Jacksonville to say goodbye. He died before she arrived.  Devastated, Madeleine made a pledge in Charles’s honor: “I have to succeed in my writing for Father’s sake as well as my own,” she wrote in her journal on December 11, 1936, “for it meant so much to him, and he just missed success by bad fortune and not enough discipline.” An absent or distant father would become a leitmotif in many of her novels, most famously in A Wrinkle in Time, whose adolescent protagonist Meg saves her father and defeats evil through love.

Madeleine went on to attend Smith College, where in 1941 she earned a B.A. in English. Newly graduated, she moved back to New York City and began a 6 year career in the theater. On Broadway and on tour, she made good use of her many hours in the wings and backstage by summoning that “force field of silence” to write a first novel — The Small Rain (Vanguard: 1945) — in snatches of time between scenes.

The New York Times called the novel “evidence of a fresh new talent,” the work of a “young actress [who had] somehow managed to compose [it] during the hurry and bustle of a road tour.” Strong, steady sales earned Madeleine a livable income for the next several years. Fourteen months after the publication of The Small Rain, Madeleine followed up with her second book, Ilsa.

It was in Eva LeGallienne’s Broadway production of “The Cherry Orchard” that Madeleine met the actor Hugh Franklin, who would become her husband in 1946. They began a family and moved to an old farmhouse in Goshen, CT. They called their new home “Crosswicks,” after the New Jersey childhood estate of Madeleine’s father, and joined the local Congregational Church.

The quaint New England farming village had an old general store in need of new management–they bought that, too. Madeleine helped to run it part-time, while also being a full-time mother and part-time novelist (Camilla Dickinson, published in 1951, would land on O Magazine’s 2009 summer reading list) writing at the kitchen table in short bursts of time between toddler interruptions.

Later, she would admit that the only time her force field of silence failed her was when she had crawling toddlers. She wrote on, though, and as a housewife in the late 1950s managed to compose one of the great American novels of the 20th century.

Madeleine wrote A Wrinkle in Time, so different from anything that she had written before–so different from anything that anybody had written before–after a period of doubt, when she was questioning her worth and value as both a writer who wasn’t getting published and a housewife who failed at baking pies and waxing floors. She didn’t know if she believed in God anymore, and despaired of the meaning and purpose of life. Her minister recommended she read thick theological texts. They only put her to sleep. Then Madeleine discovered a new vision of the Divine in an unlikely place–physics. She read the work of Albert Ein­stein, Max Planck, and Werner Heisenberg. In their writings she was reminded of her glimpse of glory as a child being shown the night sky. In their writings she saw a reverence for the beauty and laws of the universe and for the ever unfolding understanding of it. In the more than 60 books Madeleine wrote across genres, her work came to em­brace the imagery and language of both science and spiritu­ality.

A Wrinkle in Time incorporates themes that had been percolating in her diaries for years, from reflections on personal “faults” to Einstein’s writings on relativity. Around the tesseract Madeleine constructed an unconventional family living in a conventional town, a girl whose teachers underestimated her, a father who was gone too soon, and an evil that ruled by convincing people that being different was the problem. And the tesseract connected that family and that girl to an entire universe of unimaginable creatures all connected to one powerful source of Light.

“If I’ve ever written a book that says what I believe about God and the universe, this is it,” Madeleine L’Engle confided to her private journal on June 2nd, 1960.

But A Wrinkle in Time would not be published for another two years. Editors didn’t think it would sell.

“I know [this] is a good book,” Madeleine told herself, shaking off the first few snubs. “…This is my psalm of praise to life, my stand for life against death.” The novel was not easily classifiable, and therefore not easily marketable. Madeleine and the book she believed to be her masterpiece received some 25 to 40 rejections (she revised the number with each retelling). Finally, A Wrinkle in Time found a home at the literary house of Farrar, Straus & Giroux, who published it in 1962.

A Wrinkle in Time went on to win the prestigious 1963 Newbery medal and has sold over 16 million copies in more than 30 languages, and counting.

But the attention wasn’t always positive. Given the enormous popularity of the Narnia books, especially embraced by evangelicals, Madeleine was dismayed by the outcry over A Wrinkle in Time and its four sequels. The books were controversial for their use of religion—some thought there was too much, others not enough. Conservative evangelicals lobbied for its removal from school libraries, accusing her of promoting witchcraft and “New Age-ism.” Many Christian bookstores refused to sell A Wrinkle in Time. The book now holds the distinction of being one of the most frequently banned novels in American literature.

With that, Madeleine L’Engle became one of few authors to experience enduring literary superstardom during their lifetime, and one of even fewer to live long enough—another 44 years—to see their book take root in the culture, changing the lives of generations of readers and transforming the landscape of possibility for women writers of science fiction and female protagonists. Meg Murry would become an enduring and universal symbol of adolescent angst and girl power—one of the most cherished and iconic characters in American fiction. Millions of lonely young people have felt empowered. I can fight the darkness. I am not alone.

By then, Madeleine and Hugh had moved with their three children–Josephine, Maria, and Bion–back to New York City, to an apartment on Manhattan’s far upper west side, though they kept Crosswicks as a weekend and summer retreat. Hugh had returned to theatre life, and Madeleine carved herself a niche as volunteer librarian in the Diocesan House of the Episcopal Cathedral of St. John the Divine. There, she wrote some 25 more books, and from there she met with fans and school groups, acted as confessor and spiritual advisor to many, hosted work sessions with her editor, and coordinated occasional community outreach efforts, like writing workshops for urban teens, free at the Cathedral and taught by herself and author friends. Nearly every day she was in town, Madeleine arrived at her desk in the Episcopal Cathedral of Saint John the Divine library at 10 am, her Irish setters by her side; at noon daily, she joined others in the chapel to celebrate the Eucharist. In 2012, on what would have been Madeleine’s 94th birthday, the Cathedral’s Diocesan House was dedicated a “literary landmark” in her honor.

As the children grew, Hugh’s own career took an unexpected turn: in 1970, he was cast in the first episode of All My Children as Dr. Charles Tyler, a role he would play for the next 13 years. As a soap opera star, Hugh became more recognizable than his wife and was often approached by adoring fans for autographs when they were out and about, much to Madeleine’s amusement.

In later years, Madeleine was on the road as much as she was home in Crosswicks or her New York City apartment. She seized nearly every speaking request that came her way, honing her performance skills on literary festivals, children’s book tour circuits, schools and colleges, Christian conferences, retreats (especially for women), and churches. She beguiled audiences with props and dramatic readings, and in churches preached sermons that were “always captivating and original and yet informed by a powerful understanding of classic religion,” said her friend, the author Sidney Offit. In the second half of her life, she cultivated an enormous fan base while racking up 17 honorary doctorates, a National Book Award, and the National Humanities Medal, among many other recognitions.

After Hugh died in 1986, Madeleine’s life remained full of friends, family, and literary events. She kept to her busy speaking and writing schedule until well beyond her 80th birthday. She died on September 8, 2007 in Litchfield, Connecticut.

— Abigail Santamaria

 

(c) 2018 by Abigail Santamaria